on a different thread (http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/members/private/211210/3/my-life-well-the-first-part-at-least.
someone commented that.
as a sister especially you are nothing when not attached to you husband.. this made me curious.
........Brother PUH-leeeeze.
Funny thing is, all those same sisters that didn't give you the time of day, they all end up in Judicial Committees somewhere down the road, or needing special assistance from the elders cuz their marriage is on the rocks. Hilarious to me. Reminds me of the old Biz Markie song, Vapors.
i will, in this post attempt to filter my thoughts thru the prism of political correctness and thereby cause no offense to anybody.
if i fail, i ask that the "jury disregard those comments" ( laughable if a judge says it because it underlines what was said).. since the watchtower allows nothing but ( a veneer) of male domination, it faces a bleak future because of the decline of masculinity in general society.
they abhor the idea of any 'sunday school' or more and so are not training young men to be fathers, husbands or just men generally.. i once went to a 'get together' - so called because the term 'party' might create offense - and noticed young brothers together with (hot) young sisters..................................................discussing shoes !!!!.
metatron ( you may now return to the PC world and initiate flaming me)
Let me tell you something Mutha F#$#$, actually, I haven't read this post yet. I'm looking forward to it later though!!! Earlier today I was reading Eldridge Cleaver's thoughts on James Baldwin, who was gay, and I wonder if your post is in a similar vein. I'll find out later. G'night all!
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
AND Liberals LIE with impunity , No shame what so ever ...best example, Wenier LOL
You probably looked at that picture more than anybody else on the web. You haven't had any action in years, and that's the closest you were going to get.
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
Can you imagine using the word "gay" innocently around a group of adolescent guys. They'd laugh their ass off so much that you would never get anything done.
LOL, it's gotten better I think though. When I was younger, I could call someone a faggot quicker than I could my social security number. I don't talk like that anymore, but I found it humorous when at the bus stop there was some teenagers. They ripped and ragged on one another, and all you heard was, "He's so gay." "You're gay!"
i'll be the first to admit that i haven't done the research on this one, and i can't remember the answer from my jw days - but there's something bothering me about the scenario of judas and his betrayal of jesus.. considering that the betrayal of jesus by judas was foretold in prophecy, it was essentially set in stone.
it was going to happen, it was an absolute because divine prophecy is correct.
judas had to betray jesus in order to fulfil prophecy.. now, i've always personally believed that a person does not sin by an act that they cannot avoid, but this seems like kind of the motherload of standing on the traintracks.
The thing I always wondered is why would you betray someone who you know raised the dead on more than one occasion or healed the sick and infirmed or had a measure of control over demons who possessed a man, or walked on water, amongst many other things that were too many to be recorded on paper? There's some dudes down the street from where I live who I wouldn't look at the wrong way if you catch my drift. The kind of guys that make people disappear.
So if Jesus was real, and all the miracles attributed to him were real, why would one of his closest followers betray someone that powerful? Is it possible the story was bunk to begin with?
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
I don't think massacre and rape are the same thing there Violia but thanks for trying.
Thanks Sooner LOL, I forgot to address that. LOL.
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
I don't feel remotely guilty about having those thoughts, and I'll explain why. That man is playing a role, but his role is detrimental to the social fabric in this country. People such as him, and Palin, they feed the extremist elements in this country, and when these conservative extremists who aren't rational to begin with, when they go off and blow something up, or shoot something up, people like Beck and Palin share a measure of responsibility for those actions. They're rabble rousers in the same way extremist Imans incite violence against the infidels. Bury your head in the sand all you want, but I see unnecessary bloodshed in the future, and Beck will have blood on his hands. It'd be one thing if he truly believed the tripe he talks, but he's in this for the money. This country has enough people like Ri, who's about as bright as a toe nail, and who eats this gobbly gook up, and Beck is getting paid handsomely, all for playing a character, a role.
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
I have contempt for Glen Beck's views but now I also have contempt for yours
Ya know the funny thing.......I think we've been through this before. I'm chuckling as I'm writing this because there was something else that set you off on me because I held violent thoughts towards someone in popular culture LOL. I can't recall LOL.
i think of myself as 'moderate libertarian' if i must attach a lapel card.
and i'm not sure that is entirely the correct one.. i endorse fiscal conservative thinking, believe in limited government, and a strong domestic defense policy.
in these areas, i could find myself in agreement with the talk show host.
What I think about Glenn Beck..........excuse my language, but I'd like to whoop his azz. I'd massacre that dude, I'd love to do it right in front of his wife, kids, and anybody else that has a measure of respect for that clown. Just strip him of all his dignity and manhood, make him my little girl. He's a phony coward, and he owes Limbaugh. Matter fact, all these conservative talk show hosts owe Limbaugh. They're like nats on the big dog's penis. None of them original, just taking Limbaugh's schtick and modifying or tweaking it here or there, and making money off of all the jackasses that need their ears tickled because they're too bull headed to view America through the eyes of people they have negative preconcieved notions about. Beck reminds me of the Watchtower and his followers remind me of some JWs who are incapable of thinking outside the box, largely because they don't want to. They like what they hear, even when they know someting is wrong about it. Whether that says something about themselves, or their puppet, I don't know.
LOL, Satanus.
